Ramat Beit Shemesh women voluntarily don burqas

by Heshy Fried on December 3, 2007 · 25 comments

I have been wondering why there have not been any crazy bans or chumras proposed by the ultra orthodox sects of Jews in quite some time. Just a few months back it seemed like every week there would be some sort of story about bannings and chumras, and all the sudden as if they needed some time off from the Charedi Chumra Patrol these stringencies ceased just like that.

I begining to miss writing articles detailing the funny reasons behind many of these chumras and bans, and the constant criticism I get for criticizing folks that must be doing good for their peeps. Then I received this article from Jameel about Charedi women in Ramat Beit Shemesh who have started to wear the full body burqa, because the shabbos robe is just not ugly enough. It seems that wearing just a dark baggy outfit and plastic haired wig could not scare the flirtatious people that hang around the chassidic neighborhoods of Ramat Beit Shemesh, so the ladies decided to take it into their own hands. Without the approval of the men, which is definitely bound to work some people up- they have donned the burqa, not many but enough to be noticed.

A while back I was thinking of what could be the next thing to be banned, and like any logical Jew I felt that the best thing they could ban in order to keep up with their philosophies- were women themselves. You see there is really no point of the women according to many people besides that of child making babies, cholent and doing the laundry. Banning women from public solves some issues that have come up recently, such as whom to charge for those Cherem Forms that they like to throw up on bus stop walls, and how to force the women to walk on their side of the street- when the Charedim themselves do not want cops in their neighborhoods. So naturally the solution is to ban women outright, from public places at least.

Now this whole Burqa thing is almost is a very weird situation for the higher ups, because while many Rabbis would love to see all the women reduced to giant sacks with wholes for the eyes, they do not want to be undermined of their power by having women chas v’shalom actually carrying out the decree themselves, whats a guy to do?

As long as they don’t start the honor killings, in frum neighborhoods I am cool with it, I am not charedi, so to me its just a matter of reporting. Fair and Unbalanced like Fox News.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Possibly related posts:

{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }

Anonymous December 3, 2007 at 3:26 AM

“Fair and Unbalanced like Fox News.”

o rly?

Reply

commonsensejew December 3, 2007 at 3:28 AM

Good lord! Bangin’ biblical burqa babes bathe beautfically by broken bathhouse brouhaha. What else begins with B? Maybe this cracked out rebetzin will advocate beating the women if they remove the burqa. Not in the face! I saw the head covering thingie on women in Beis Yisroel, which kinda covered most of the upper torso. That was weird; this is weirder! It is a sign of the break from traditional rational judaism shown by these chareidim. Work is for lesser people, wife wears a burqa, you fear and despise anyone who is not like you: sounds pretty arab-like to me! Thankfully I think this faction is smallish; let’s see a “gadol” come out against this idiot rebetzin! Any bets on how long that will be?

Reply

Rachel December 3, 2007 at 4:16 AM

I really don’t think that this article is real. I know it seems to link to Haaretz, but I went directly to the Haaretz websites in Hebrew and in English, and neither one had this article. I think someone’s playing a very sophisticated joke.

Reply

sarah December 3, 2007 at 4:18 AM

nothing says inconspicuous like Jewish women wearing burqas. What I’d like to understand is what causes the quoted woman to not want men to look at her at all. And how does she prove she’s Jewish by showing people her children? “Yossele, drop trou so the nice soldier can see you’re circumcised?” Yikes. But, whatever they like. As long as they’re not telling me how to dress and they’re happy, I really don’t care how they dress ( it’s certainly not my own cup of public dress tea, though).

Reply

commonsensejew December 3, 2007 at 4:58 AM

Rachel, I would think that this is a joke as well; if I had not seen with my own eyes freaky chareidi women in meah shearim wearing the hijab style headcovering. When in the history of the jewish people have women done this crap?

Reply

heshman December 3, 2007 at 5:50 AM

Even if its fake, the fact that it is believable is real mans that it could in fact be real.

Reply

JoJo December 3, 2007 at 2:22 PM

“I really don’t think that this article is real. I know it seems to link to Haaretz, but I went directly to the Haaretz websites in Hebrew and in English, and neither one had this article. I think someone’s playing a very sophisticated joke.”

The Ha’Eretz Article

Reply

bad4shidduchim December 3, 2007 at 2:31 PM

If it’s a joke, it’s a good one because it’s so believable.

Reply

Frum Librarian December 3, 2007 at 3:49 PM

Oh my gosh! This is not even one of those things where we can say “It’s ok for them but we are not on that level” because this cannot be what G-d wants of us as women! I once heard a speech on tznius in which the speaker said that the face and hands are the parts of one’s body that really show who we are, and that is why they are always shown- men are supposed to focus on who a woman is, not what her body looks like. This is such a distortion of halacha, it really nauseates me!

Reply

The nerve December 3, 2007 at 8:54 PM

This is another case of people taking the Torah and twisting it to fit their Psycosis.

Reply

mindlepindle December 3, 2007 at 9:04 PM

Frum librarian’s point completely blows any claim that this is a higher level of tsnius to pieces.

Reply

Yochanan December 3, 2007 at 9:51 PM

If anything could disillusion a BT, especially a Baalat Teshuvah, it’s this.

No matter how much you cover up, for some it’s never enough.

Reply

commonsensejew December 3, 2007 at 11:52 PM

yochanan, you mock the jewish sharia law?! 100 lashes with a wet tallis!

Reply

heshman December 4, 2007 at 1:44 AM

Thank you Commonsense for that comment, I am rolling.

Reply

Anonymous December 4, 2007 at 3:04 AM

inbreeding leads to really weird looking women. kudos for covering up. now if you’d diet too…

Reply

heshman December 4, 2007 at 3:27 AM

The problem with making them diet is that then you may be able to see certain outlines that deem them as women.

Reply

dman December 4, 2007 at 8:01 PM

Did you intend this to be funny? It is not.

Reply

Hesh December 4, 2007 at 9:24 PM

I did intend it to be funny, didnt come out that great, but I did need a post to throw along with the article.

Reply

Left Brooklyn December 5, 2007 at 12:02 AM

Sad, sad, sad. Haven’t they heard of beged akum??

LMAO

Reply

Lady-Light January 2, 2008 at 11:23 PM

I thought you linked me on your blogroll? But I’m not there, boo-hoo! If you link me, I’ll link you, too. (Isn’t that poetic?)
I am writing a post about this very subject: the hijab-wearing Jew.
Will post it soon…please visit!

Reply

Misanthrope February 13, 2008 at 6:37 AM

This article made me wonder when the Jewish Jim Jones is going to come along.

Reply

sh March 26, 2008 at 11:04 AM

i’m not sure if it reached the news in the u.s. already, but the head of the cult was arrested yesterday for child abuse, and apparently the charges against her are going to include incest.

Reply

s(b.) March 26, 2008 at 11:15 AM

sh, that’s terrible. very sorry to hear that.

Reply

heshman March 26, 2008 at 11:22 AM

I just got an email about this- what a bunch of retards!

Reply

s(b.) March 26, 2008 at 11:38 AM

hesh, I can’t read that fast without vowels. is this a joke? http://7fatcow.com/2008/02/02/charedim-to-ban-hard-long-vegetables/

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: